BEYMUN RECOGNITION GUIDELINES

Home
BEYMUN RECOGNITION GUIDELINES

The BEYMUN Recognition Guidelines aim to acknowledge and celebrate outstanding performance and contributions by delegates, committee chairs, and delegations during the conference. These guidelines foster a competitive yet constructive environment, encouraging diplomacy, substantive knowledge, leadership, and teamwork among all participants. The following awards will be presented at the BEYMUN conference:

1. Best Committee Chair Award:

Criteria:

Effectively moderates committee sessions, ensuring inclusive participation and maintaining decorum.

Facilitates productive debate, guiding the resolution-building process towards constructive outcomes.

Exhibits exceptional leadership, approachability, and fairness in managing committee dynamics.

Selection Process:

Delegates will have the opportunity to provide anonymous feedback on committee chairs' performance through evaluation forms.

Committee chairs and vice chairs will be assessed on their ability to steer committee sessions, manage time effectively, and encourage delegate engagement.

The conference Secretariat, in consultation with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct an in-depth review of all evaluations to identify potential Best Committee Chair recipients.

The final decision on Best Committee Chair recipients will be made based on the comprehensive review of evaluations.

2. Outstanding Delegate Award:

Criteria:

Demonstrates exceptional and exemplary diplomacy, negotiation skills, and leadership across all committees.

Exhibits a deep understanding of committee topics and provides well-researched and innovative solutions.

Actively contributes to the resolution-building process and collaborates effectively with delegates.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs will nominate outstanding delegates from their respective committees.

Nominated delegates will be assessed based on their performance in their respective committee during the conference.

The conference Secretariat, in collaboration with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct a comprehensive review of nominated delegates' evaluations to identify potential Overall Outstanding Delegate recipients.

The final decision on Overall Outstanding Delegate recipients will be made based on the comprehensive review of evaluations.

3. Best Delegate Award from Each Committee:

Criteria:

Demonstrates excellent diplomacy, negotiation skills, and leadership within the specific committee.

Exhibits a deep understanding of committee topics and provides well-researched and innovative solutions.

Actively contributes to the resolution-building process and collaborates with other delegates effectively.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs will evaluate delegates' performance based on pre-defined criteria during committee sessions.

Delegates will be assessed on their public speaking, negotiation skills, resolution writing, and ability to build consensus within their committee.

The conference Secretariat, in collaboration with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will thoroughly review all evaluations to ensure consistency and fairness.

Final Best Delegate recipients from each committee will be chosen based on a comprehensive review of individual evaluations.

4. Best Delegation Award:

Criteria:

The number and distribution of awards received by the delegation will be considered. This includes Honorable Mentions, Verbal Commendations, and other recognitions received by the delegation's individual delegates across different committees. A delegation's ability to secure awards in multiple committees will be indicative of their overall engagement and effectiveness in diverse settings.

The depth and significance of the awards received by the delegation will be thoroughly evaluated. The substance and impact of the delegation's contributions, positions in committee debates, and resolution writing will be taken into account. Awards received for outstanding diplomacy, negotiation skills, leadership, and resolution-building will carry more weight in the assessment.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs will evaluate individual delegates' performance in their respective committees, considering their engagement, diplomacy, substantive contributions, and leadership skills.

Committee chairs and vice chairs will nominate delegates for Honorable Mentions, Verbal Commendations, and other awards based on their evaluations and pre-defined criteria.

The conference Secretariat, in collaboration with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct a comprehensive review of all nominations and evaluations. They will assess the quality and significance of awards received by each delegation in various committees.

The Secretariat will ensure consistency in evaluations and awards distribution across different committees to maintain fairness in the selection process.

5. Best Position Paper Award:

Criteria:

Submits well-researched, comprehensive, and persuasive position papers.

Effectively outlines the delegate's country or character's stance on the topics.

Provides thoughtful and innovative solutions to the issues under discussion.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs along with the USG of Committees will thoroughly review and assess all submitted position papers before the conference.

Position papers will be evaluated based on their depth of research, clarity of ideas, and alignment with committee topics.

The conference Secretariat, in consultation with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct a comprehensive review of all position paper evaluations to identify potential Best Position Paper recipients.

The final decision on Best Position Paper recipients will be made based on the comprehensive review of evaluations.

6. Honorable Mention:

Criteria:

Displays commendable diplomacy, negotiation skills, and substantive contributions during the conference.

Demonstrates active engagement and valuable contributions to committee discussions.

Shows potential for growth and improvement in future Model UN conferences.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs will provide input on delegates deserving of recognition.

Delegates will be assessed on their overall engagement, participation, and commitment to substantive debate.

The conference Secretariat, in collaboration with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct a comprehensive review of all evaluations to identify potential Honorable Mention recipients.

The final decision on Honorable Mention recipients will be made based on the comprehensive review of evaluations.

7. Verbal Commendation:

Criteria:

Demonstrates consistent engagement and active participation in committee sessions.

Provides substantive contributions and constructive input to resolution-building.

Exhibits a positive attitude and willingness to collaborate with other delegates.

Selection Process:

Committee chairs and vice chairs will provide input on delegates who deserve verbal commendation.

Delegates will be assessed on their consistent participation, contributions to debate, and positive attitude throughout the conference.

The conference Secretariat, in consultation with the Under-Secretary-General of Committees, will conduct a comprehensive review of all evaluations to identify potential Verbal Commendation recipients.

The final decision on Verbal Commendation recipients will be made based on the comprehensive review of evaluations.

Award Presentation:

The Recognition Ceremony will be held during the closing ceremony to honor recipients of all awards.
Overall Outstanding Delegate, Best Delegate, Best Committee Chair, Best Position Paper and Best Delegation recipients will receive certificates and medals.
Honorable Mention and Verbal Commendation recipients will receive certificates during the ceremony.

Confidentiality and Impartiality:

The recognition process remains confidential, and delegates'identities are not disclosed during deliberations.
Recognition decisions are based on objective assessments and committee staff input, ensuring impartiality.

No Appeal Process:

There will be no appeal process for recognition decisions to maintain the integrity and impartiality of the evaluation.

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Best Chair Award:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Moderation Skills	Ability to effectively moderate committee sessions, ensuring inclusive participation and decorum
Leadership	Exhibits strong leadership qualities in managing committee dynamics and guiding debates
Time Management	Skillfully manages time during sessions, ensuring efficient debate and resolution-building
Delegate Engagement	Encourages active delegate engagement and participation in committee discussions
Resolution-Building	Guides the committee towards constructive outcomes and successful resolution writing
Diplomacy	Demonstrates diplomatic approach in managing conflicts and building alliances
Approachability	Exhibits approachable demeanor, encouraging delegates to seek guidance and assistance
Fairness	Demonstrates fairness in addressing delegate concerns and providing equal opportunities
Adaptability	Shows flexibility and adaptability in responding to changing committee dynamics

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Best Delegate Award:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Diplomacy	Demonstrates exemplary diplomacy and negotiation skills in committee discussions
Substantive Knowledge	Exhibits in-depth understanding of committee topics and provides well-researched solutions
Leadership	Demonstrates leadership qualities and the ability to collaborate effectively with others
Resolution Writing	Contributes effectively to resolution writing, drafting clear and well-articulated clauses
Public Speaking	Demonstrates strong public speaking skills, delivering articulate and persuasive speeches
Negotiation Skills	Exhibits effective negotiation skills in building alliances and seeking common ground
Engagement	Actively engages in committee debates, discussions, and contributes constructively
Collaboration	Works collaboratively with other delegates, fostering an atmosphere of teamwork and cooperation
Conflict Resolution	Handles conflicts diplomatically and seeks productive solutions to disputes

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Best Delegation Award:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Award Distribution	Number and distribution of awards (Honorable Mentions, Verbal Commendations, etc.) received by the delegation across different committees.
Quality of Awards	The depth and significance of the awards received. Evaluating the substance and impact of the delegation's contributions and positions in committee debates and resolution writing.

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Best Position Paper Award:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Depth of Analysis	Demonstrates comprehensive research and analysis of committee topics, providing unique insights.
Clarity of Content	Presents ideas and arguments coherently, with a clear and well-structured position paper.
Persuasiveness	Convincingly conveys the delegate's country or character's stance on the topics and proposed solutions.
Supporting Evidence	Backs up claims with credible sources and evidence to strengthen the paper's credibility.
Originality	Offers innovative and creative approaches to addressing the issues at hand.
Quality of Writing	Exhibits strong writing skills, including grammar, style, and language proficiency.
Adherence to Format	Follows the designated position paper format and guidelines.

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Honorable Mention Certificates:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Diplomacy	Diplomacy Displays diplomatic skills in negotiations and interactions with other delegates.
Substantive Knowledge	Demonstrates a good understanding of committee topics and provides feasible solutions.
Leadership	Shows leadership potential and actively engages in committee activities.
Resolution Support	Contributes to resolution writing and supports other delegates' ideas through collaboration.
Public Speaking	Communicates ideas effectively through speeches, demonstrating confidence and clarity.
Engagement	Actively participates in committee discussions and debates, contributing constructively.
Collaboration	Works well with others, fostering a cooperative atmosphere within the committee.
Adaptability	Demonstrates flexibility in responding to unexpected challenges and changes in committee dynamics.

Table of Criteria and Evaluation for the Verbal Commendation Certificates:

Criteria	Description	Evaluation Scale (1-10)
Knowledgeable	Displays a good understanding of committee topics and relevant issues.
Constructive	Offers constructive contributions to discussions and debate, promoting thoughtful dialogue.
Active Participation	Actively participates in committee sessions and engages with other delegates' ideas.
Effective Communication	Communicates ideas clearly and effectively during speeches and moderated caucus sessions.
Team Player	Demonstrates a willingness to work collaboratively with others to achieve common goals.
Problem-Solving	Offers creative and pragmatic solutions to address challenges in the committee.
Resilience	Maintains composure and adaptability even in high-pressure situations.
Positive Influence	Exerts a positive influence on the committee's atmosphere and encourages teamwork.